Corporate Strategies: Organizational Change in the Future
(I wrote this in 2008 as a memo in response to an adult
student’s question about what I thought of the book Fifth Discipline. While
still somewhat unrealistic - organizations are still run by managers who lack
the self-confidence to ask others for advice and ideas - I think the current
trends of quicker reaction to change, recognition of "high value-added
employees," and more sophisticated IT software are moving organizations in
this direction. At least the good ones.)
I'm glad you read Fifth
Discipline, even though it's rather dense.
Many of the ideas in the book are now the starting points for a lot of
writing on management.
I believe that the best way for organizations to achieve
superior performance and survive in the long run is to be adaptive, to be a
"learning organization." This
means that everyone in the organization is encouraged (and rewarded) to come up
with new ideas and methods. These new
ideas are then implemented and propagated throughout the company, the key goal
of organizational design. Discussion
often leads to other new ideas, leading to "tipping points" of
fundamental change. One method to change
mentalities and transmission channels in a large organization is your
experience - a specific project that brings together people from different departments
or functional specialties. Another is
new software to share new ideas and knowledge throughout the company.
You recognized that your experiences were very different
than your day-to-day experience and opened up new possibilities. What you implied was that you and the other
members of the group were using their intelligence and skills collectively to
solve complicated and important tasks, far beyond what was required in your
daily jobs. To me, good companies have
institutionalized this idea - that everyone in the company can contribute to
improving the competitive position of the company today and help the company
adapt to rapid change (or create the change).
I suspect that in successful companies in the future
everyone in the company will be a "manager." You already have more education and general
knowledge than the average manager of two generations ago. Organizational hierarchies won't mean very
much; they won't reflect where new ideas come from or how they are
implemented. Possibly, this is why so
many management positions are being eliminated; the old control, command and
coordinate systems just don't work any more.
Many of the repetitive supervisory functions of management will be done
by software.
Ideally, top management's role is the strategic interface
between the external environment and the company. They ask, "What is it we are doing"
and "What should we be doing?"
This is sometime called "vision." They convey a general sense of direction and,
when necessary, change of direction. But
they should leave it to the other employees to figure out how to get there. Surprisingly, the U.S. Marines are
incorporating this kind of thinking in their training of junior officers and
tactical combat units.
Paradoxically, I think that fairly continuous structure and
general direction are important as a framework within which to execute change. Successful organizations will find the right
mix of continuity and change. This might
mean there should not be rapid turnover in top managers who rely on their experience
in other organizations or industries. Clear
objectives; general, flexible strategies; and very flexible tactics relying on
well-informed, empowered, cooperative and innovative employees.
One speculative comment.
I was thinking about hospitals.
My guess is that the revolution in the delivery of new medical services
will radically change what hospitals do.
In fact, I don't believe that hospitals in their current form or
function will exist in 30 years. Already
most testing such as MRIs and endoscopies are now done outside of
hospitals. There will be far less
surgery, which will be viewed as a barbaric relic. Non-invasive genetic surgery
will be done in specialized clinics on an out-patient basis, like eye
laser-surgery is done now. Drug-based
cures will be delivered in a very decentralized industry, possibly even more in
the home with remote monitoring. All of
this will be far less expensive than the incredibly inefficient and expensive
current health care "system."
Forget about the "health care crisis" of the future.
OK, another speculative comment. Even more revolutionary
will be the delivery of "education."
Schools are based on assumptions about how we learn and ancient
"technology" that will be obsolete in a few decades. It's amazing what scientists, even using such
"primitive" tools as MRIs, are learning about how the brain
functions. Most "learning"
might be some form of direct absorption of visual images. How this will be done might seem a little
scary now but will probably occur because of the economics of it - cheaper,
quicker, more efficient. Students will
proceed at different speeds. Software
will include more effective feedback mechanisms. Testing will be continuous and used to
accelerate learning, not determine grades.
Teachers will tutor, suggest additional work and supervise progress. And I
will probably be unemployed, which has always been my goal.

Comments
Post a Comment