Who Do You Fear More, Big Business or Big Government?



OK, who do you fear more, big government or big business?  

Historically, Americans saw a relatively small government with regulatory powers as a check on monopoly and big business.  But the rise of big government because of the Great Depression, World War II, the Cold War, and the Great Society changed that.  Americans had a choice.  There was a general consensus that we had to spend a lot of money for national and international security during the Cold War.  But the expansion of the social welfare state and environmental regulations changed attitudes towards the federal government.  The two largest programs of the social welfare state, Social Security and Medicare, have been financed by very large tax increases. These tax increases are somewhat offset by federal income tax cuts.  

Since the 1980s, there has been a well-financed campaign to roll back the regulation of big business, especially the finance sector. This campaign has been successful.  Most populist outrage, despite the financial system causing a recession, structural unemployment and large federal budget deficits, is now directed at government, as opposed to big business in the past. Attention is focused on the effects, not the underlying causes, which are still there. 

Limiting government social welfare programs has somehow been tied to even less regulation and oversight of big business.  How did this happen?  

One reason is that much of the financing of the Tea Party movement and organizations like ALEC come from big businesses and the very wealthy owners and managers who control them. Many of them share the Tea Party and Christian right outrage over lack of government regulation and prohibition of personal behavior they find morally reprehensible.  Somehow, a generalized anger and rage over government protection and even support of this behavior has been channeled to limiting government regulation of business, including rollback of environmental legislation and regulation.

The logical Republican candidate for president, representing this generalized fear directed as loathing of government, is Donald Trump.

The American political nightmare in the past has been that big business and big government become partners rather than adversaries. There are exceptions. We accepted it in the areas of defense technology and infrastructure spending. We denounced it if it led to regulatory capture or was a barrier to technological progress. We were angry if we believed that the rich were using government to transfer income from the middle class to themselves.  We seem to have lost this outrage.

In addition, this cooperation has been raised to new levels with the need for huge sums of money to get elected and virtually no limits or accountability because of the recent Supreme Court decision allowing super PACs. They channel large sums of money to support candidates who tap into widespread fear and anger about American society and government.  These elected officials are also pro-business (reduce taxes on the rich and corporations, less environmental regulation, no anti-trust, no oversight of financial companies) or at least anti-government, which amounts to the same economic policies.

It really isn’t a question of “getting government out of people’s lives.”  Social conservatives want more government interference in individuals’ lives. It seems to be a question of big business not paying the social costs of a capitalist economic system. It’s a question of getting government out of big businesses’ lives. Regulatory capture has become total government capture.

The stagnation of middle class incomes and rising income inequality, the threat of widespread unemployment because of automation and AI, and the huge rise in temps and “consultants” without any benefits don’t seem to be major political issues. Why? Who makes the decisions that result in all this? Who outsources jobs to China and threaten American workers with more outsourcing, keeping wages down? Who eliminates pensions and other fringe benefits? Who wiped out home equity for ten million homeowners? Who is buying record numbers of robots to replace workers? Large corporations, most of which are multinational companies. The result? Record profits and bonuses even in a period of slow economic growth. This is a major reason for the redistribution of income from the middle class to the rich. No wonder the rich are willing to spend a great deal of money to protect this trend from possible government interference.

And deflect blame. President Trump reflects the belief that America's economic and employment problems are due to illegal Mexican immigrants and "China." "China" doesn't export to the United States; multinational corporations and Chinese companies do. About 60% of imports from China come from American and foreign multinationals. Much of the exports of Chinese companies are part of the global supply chain of American companies.

Perversely, the debate seems to be centered on conservative attacks on the increased cost of programs like unemployment benefits, disability benefits, Medicaid and Obamacare, nutrition aid for poor mothers and infants, and food stamps.  Programs for the poor, sick and unemployed.  Major reductions in social welfare and social safety net programs are at the heart of Republican budget proposals. These cuts are necessary to keep the Bush and Trump tax cuts for upper-income families and corporations without increasing the yearly deficits.   

The only realistic way smaller deficits will happen, let alone a balanced budget, is a combination of strong economic growth – creating strong growth in tax revenue – and tax increases, mostly disguised as eliminating deductions and subsidies.

The Republican rhetoric about smaller deficits is ideological cover for slashing social welfare and other programs that conservatives oppose. 

For the first time in American history, populist anger is aimed at government, not big business.  The federal government is seen as supporting programs and groups that are anathema to conservatives. Big business has supported this attitude in return for support for pro-business policies. You could call this ideological capture.

The situation is made worse by a zero-sum mentality. In a world of low growth and increased fear and insecurity, there is less room for compromise. There is widespread middle class perception that minority groups and the poor are getting unfair amounts of social welfare benefits that come out of middle class taxes. This is ironic since the two largest social welfare programs are Social Security and Medicare, which overwhelmingly benefit the middle class, and the lower half of the middle class do not pay any income tax. And, sadly, we seem to be losing any sense of shared community or compassion for others. 

We are seeing government in a period of disruptivd social and economic change.  Over the last 50 years, we have become a more tolerant, open and inclusive society. One result of this is behavior and culture that many people, not just conservatives, find distasteful or immoral. Combining this moral outrage with economic insecurity and a fear of the loss of power and status, is a potent political combination. The irony is that conservatives want to use the coercive powers of government to limit or outlaw some of these consequences. 


Comments

Post a Comment

Most Popular Posts

Adam Smith's Pin Factory

Image
ADAM SMITH VISITS A PIN FACTORY   Adam Smith’s description of a pin factory is on the first page of  The Wealth of Nations .  (Chapter 1 – “Of the Division of Labour”)  Drawings of pin factories of this period show workers using hand tools. Smith says the process can be broken down into 18 distinct steps, including packaging the pins. Smith mentions that pin factory workers were poorly paid, despite their high productivity.    Adam Smith says he visited a pin factory employing 10 men who produced 48,000 pins per day.  If each of the ten workers had done all the steps themselves, Smith says each worker could produce only 10 or 20 pins per day.  So the pin factory replaces 2,400 to 4,800 pin makers. The increase in labor productivity (output per person per day) is as high as 50 times that of individual pin makers.     This reduction in unit cost or average cost (AC) and the huge increase in quantity produced do not just replace older methods of organization and production.  They increa
Read more

The Structure of the Economy: Bilateral Oligopoly

Image
DEFINITION OF A BILATERAL OLIGOPOLY Models of market structure assume that the demand side is represented by a large number of buyers.  The structure of the market, and the assumed market outcomes, depends on the number of suppliers and how they compete.  Suppliers either post one price or exploit their knowledge of buyer categories by using price discrimination.  Despite the comments about the key role of consumers in determining economic performance, consumers are fairly passive when the discussion focuses on imperfectly-competitive industries.  But many markets are not structured this way; the buyers are not passive consumers but large corporations that do not passively accept suppliers’ prices.  Net prices are actively negotiated.  These markets are often bilateral oligopolies. In a bilateral oligopoly the buyers are not an undifferentiated mass of consumers but rather a small number of purchasing agents or professional buyers representing large purchasers.   T
Read more

The Stock Market Crash of 1929 and the Beginning of the Great Depression

Image
Famous Headline Introduction The usual reasons given for the Great Depression – the stock market crash of 1929 and the later collapse of the banking system – do not tell the whole story. Available economic data indicate (there were no national income accounts in 1929) that a recession had already begun before the stock market crash. The crash of October and November of 1929 was a catalyst that made the recession worse but the partial stock market recovery in early 1930 did not end the recession. Industrial production continued to fall quickly and unemployment rose rapidly in 1930. Continuing farm and businesses failures over the next two years wiped out thousands of small rural banks and threatened total financial collapse in early1933.  For a fuller explanation, we have to go back to the 1920s to see additional reasons for the origins and the rapid decline in output at the beginning of the Great Depression. We have to look at the internationa
Read more

Guide to Pages and Posts

PAGES - ECONOMICS TUTORIALS This set of economic essays in Pages are equivalent to a course in economics. They emphasize the dynamics of economic growth and development, and the role of information in the functioning of modern markets. BASIC CONCEPTS AND THEORY Chapter 1 - Introduction and Summary The Beginning of the Industrial Revolution   in England       Chapter 3 - Economic Development and Economic Growth Chapter 4  - Production Functions and  Supply Chains Chapter 5 - Demand, Income and Consumption Chapter 6 - Competition, Strategies and Structure Chapter 7 - Imperfect Competition: How Large Corporations Compete Chapter 8  - Case Study:  Parker Hannifin Chapter 9  - Bilateral Oligopoly Chapter 10 - Examples of Bilateral Oligopoly Chapter 11  - Critique of Basic Economic Theory MARKET DYNAMICS AND INFORMATION:  HOW MARKETS WORK Chapter 12  - Introduction to Information and Economic Structure Chapter 13  - How Markets Work:  Transaction Costs and Market-Makers Chapte
Read more

Explaining Derivatives - An Analogy

Image
You go around to farmers with cows. You buy all the cows and pay the farmers a small fee to milk the cows and sell the milk. You pay for the cows with ass(et)-backed securities called MBSs (Milked Bovine Securities) that you tell investors are udderly safe. But some of the cows don't give enough milk (cow flow problem) or give no milk at all. You take some of the asset-backed securities, say they're backed by the subprime cows, and use them as collateral to sell another set of securities called CMOs (Cow Milk Obligations). Then you buy CDSs (Cow Dried-up Swaps) from AIG (Angus Insurance Company) to insure the CMOs when the cows stopped giving milk. If you work it right, you collect more on the CDSs than you pay out to retire the CMOs. The money you get from selling the dead cows go to pay the CLOs (cow leather obligations). You could also sell CDOs (cow dung obligations) that depend on how much cow dung is produced. This is a typical Wall Street product - turning sh
Read more

Government Finance 101: Welcome to Alice in Wonderland

Image
    Fiscal Policy   Some basic definitions:   Deficit.    The difference between the federal government’s spending and its revenue in one fiscal year.   The fiscal year starts on October 1.  So fiscal year 2024 started on October 1, 2023. You know right away this is going to be confusing. Yearly deficits before the coronavirus were around $1 trillion per year. For fiscal year 2021, the deficit was $2.8 trillion. Total stimulus spending and tax cuts were around $4 trillion. The Congressional Budget Office’s latest projection is an average yearly deficit of $1.5 trillion for the next 10 years. This should be viewed as a minimum.   Social Security and Medicare are funded by their own taxes and working down their trust funds (selling government bonds). Subtracting Social Security and Medicare taxes from the Federal budget, other revenue covers about 50-60% of all other government spending; the other 40-50% is the deficit and financed by borrowing.   Debt .  Short for national debt.
Read more

John von Neumann Sees the Future

Image
John von Neumann JOHN VON NEUMANN CREATES THE FUTURE If you want to understand the world we live in, you have to know about the thinking of three men – Alan Turing, Claude Shannon and John von Neumann.   I’ve talked a little about Alan Turing in an earlier essay.   All three men knew each other, discussed their ideas with each other and promoted each other’s ideas. John von Neumann has been called the smartest individual of the 20 th Century.   Even an outline of his accomplishments, which you can read about in  Wikipedia, is hard to believe.   He invented game theory, which I discussed in two earlier posts.   He headed up a group of mathematicians who invented new statistical techniques at Los Alamos that made the atomic bomb possible.   In 1944, he wrote a memo that outlined the structure of the modern computer.   He then managed the design and building of a modern general computer and consulted on the building of virtually all the early computers. JOHN VON NEUMANN
Read more

The Roman Republic Commits Suicide: A Cautionary Tale for America

Image
Why Study Rome? Americans have focused on comparisons between Rome and America twice in American history.  The first time was during the period from before the Revolution to after the ratification of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, when the founding fathers and others looked to the Roman Republic for ideas and inspiration on how to structure the new government. After the American Revolution, the founding fathers, having read the Roman authors detailing the collapse of the Roman republic, worried about internal threats to the survival of their new republic.   The second time was when the United States became a superpower, especially after WWII, and then again after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. Commentators compared America to the Roman Empire at the height of its power. There was some discussion about how America becoming a permanent warfare state would affect democracy and civil society. And now a third time. Have Americans an
Read more

“Pax Americana”: The World That America Made

Image
There are two kinds of empires: the kind that rules through ruthless exploitation, and the kind that seeks to induce allies into defending themselves through economic incentives. (George Friedman) INTRODUCTION America's power and influence in the world rests on three broad, interrelated bases: 1) Overwhelming military power that can be projected anywhere in the world,     supplemented by security arrangements with allies and supporters. 2) A large, innovative, dynamic domestic economy as the basis for global economic and technological leadership. The economy provides the resources and technology to support the military and a global foreign policy. 3) Claims to moral and ideological leadership and influence, particularly the promotion of liberal democratic societies and supporting political institutions. This post will discuss the economic aspects and related security objectives of American foreign policy. It will focus on the structure of the global
Read more