The English East India Company (EIC): Model for Future Multinational Corporations?

 INTRODUCTION

 

The English East India Company (EIC) was an innovative new type of corporation. It was not only a multinational corporations but it was created to exploit the profit potential of global trade. 


It might be a model for how a multinational corporation (MNC) could survive and prosper in an increasingly chaotic and hostile geopolitical world.


For a description of the structure and strategy of the English East India Company, see The English East India Company (EIC):  Trade with Asia

 

 

THE EIC AS A MODEL FOR FUTURE MNCs?

 

The international political structure is now moving in reverse as the post-World War II economic and political order created mostly by the United States is breaking down. America seems to be less willing to pay for global political leadership, reverting back to its traditional policies of isolationism and protectionism. It hugely expensive military is paid for with deficit financing. Wealthy countries cannot pay for all of their programs; frustrations seem to be expressed in voting for nationalist political parties headed by authoritarian leaders. Most wealthy countries, including the United States, are attempting to limit immigration. Most of the more than 100 new countries created after World War II are dysfunctional or corrupt. Civil wars and local conflicts disrupt the global economy, in addition to terrorist groups, pirates, and criminal gangs.

 

 

At the same time, the global economy dominated by multinational corporations operating on a global scale continues to expand. Markets, supply chain technology and organization, telecommunications, transportation, and finance are now all global. They all transcend national borders. Multinational companies have stronger economic links with companies in their ecosystem in other countries than with the rest of their national economy.

 

 

While the East India Company operated in a different era, it may suggest some lessons for our times because it operated in a fragmented Asian environment similar to the global one currently evolving. The global political system constructed by the United States after World War II is breaking down. There are over 200 nation-states and territories. Many are poor or small. Many are autocratic (not democratic). But all are sovereign within their borders, although in many cases this sovereignty is limited.

 

 

The greatest danger now (2024-25) to multinational corporations, predominantly American, is the American government. President Trump's pursuit of narrow mercantilist goals — fluctuating tariffs and trade restrictions, attacking universities and greatly reducing research funds, cutting off immigration of technological and scientific personnel, increasing shipping costs, and extorting money from large companies — adversely impact multinational corporations.

 

No country, with the possible exception of China, protects and supports its companies abroad. (More detail – similarities and differences from EIC. More instruments of Chinese geopolitical projection of power and influence? What about new high-tech companies?) Many are state owned and share some similarities with the EIC.

 

Maybe multinational corporations, in this environment, will evolve to be more like the EIC. They will need some way to protect themselves from the “extractive” policies of political elites. Governments have power - sovereignty, guns, laws, forms of coercion, corruption and cooptation, “populist” support, that can be used against private companies. They have centralized bureaucracies and armies. But companies control most economic resources (except natural resources like fossil fuels and minerals) and innovate new technology. They have large financial resources. Employees of multinational companies may possibly have alternative loyalties.

 

 

MORE SPECULATION ON FUTURE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS

 

For a wildly imaginative vision of a future society (not too future) dominated by powerful corporations similar to the EIC (with advanced technology similar to AI), see Neil Stephenson's The Diamond Age. The book centers around an English global company much like the EIC. This corporation combines nostalgic Victorian culture and loyalties with advanced technology and political power.

 

No one seems to be conjecturing how corporate structures and economic organization will be affected by new technologies such as unsupervised AI, AI-driven singularity, and quantum computing. In an environment of shrinking population and labor force, burgeoning national debt, and increasingly dysfunctional (or to be fair, overwhelmed) central governments.

 

Another vision is in Donald Westlake’s Good Behavior. It argues that the political structures of nation-states are breaking down. The world is becoming more like the feudalism of the Middle Ages. Kings and emperors (central national governments) had limited power. Local areas were controlled by different types of aristocrats – barons, princes, dukes, etc. The people in a barons’ area of control were loyal to the baron, not the king. Local rulers fought each other. To a large extent, barons were independent of kings and their governments.

 

Multinational corporations (MNCs) have some of the attributes of the medieval barons. Sovereign in their own domains, they demand loyalty, negotiate and compete with other. MNCs are part of a hierarchy of organizations with responsibilities to each other. 

 

Multinational corporations are increasingly at the whim of national policies, particularly those of autocratic rulers. Autocratic rulers commonly threaten and extort funds from corporations. 

 

When the political objectives of nation-states begin to seriously reduce and jeopardize the profits, or even the survival of multinational corporations, MNCs might began to take measures to protect themselves. Some of these measures may bring them into direct conflict with nation-states.

 

Already there are large areas where the national governments’ writ doesn’t run. Many groups besides MNCs avoid national power and control. Companies and wealthy individual avoid national laws and launder money, often gained from illegal activities. The more sophisticated, ones who hire lawyers and specialized financial consultants, use shell companies. Cryptocurrencies are used to avoid the financial system and reporting of income. Drug and criminal gangs control large areas. Other areas are controlled by ethnic groups at war with the central government. “Informal” and illegal economic activity beyond government control or oversight make up a large part of the economies of many countries.

==========================================

For historical background and context on the EIC, see

Comments

Most Popular Posts

Adam Smith's Pin Factory

Bilateral Oligopoly

The Stock Market Crash of 1929 and the Beginning of the Great Depression

List of Posts By Topic

Government Finance 101. Fiscal Policy: Welcome to Alice in Wonderland

Explaining Derivatives - An Analogy

Josiah Wedgwood, the Wedgwood Pottery Company, and the Beginning of the Industrial Revolution in England

The Roman Republic Commits Suicide: A Cautionary Tale for America

John von Neumann Sees the Future

“Pax Americana”: The World That America Made