Arab Spring, Arab Autumn



The post-war rule of autocratic, secular strongmen backed by their military and secret police is coming to an end.  Last year saw the fall of regimes in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya and Yemen.  There is open revolt in Syria.  Demonstrations continue in Bahrain, even after earlier demonstrations were suppressed by Saudi Arabian troops.  The kings of Morocco and Jordan have made concessions towards democracy.  A democratic election that went against the ayatollah-supported regime in Iran was disqualified and leaders were arrested; despite this, anti-government demonstrations continue.  Then there is the special case of the overthrow of Hussein in Iraq.

The immediate issue is the lack of economic growth and development, the inability to provide jobs for its young population.  The demographic clock is ticking.  Within a generation or two, the Middle East will have a smaller, older population, with the possibility of far fewer resources to support it.


THE ROLE OF DEMOGRAPHICS

The most surprising fact about the Middle East is the low birthrate in the populous countries of Egypt, Iran and Turkey (also Tunisia and Algeria).  The Arab world, Turkey and Iran are facing a demographic decline.  The region is far along one of the fastest declines in birthrates in history.  From 1950 to 2010, it went from some of the highest birthrates in the world to some of the lowest.  Birthrates in Iran, Turkey, Algeria and Tunisia are below replacement.  Egypt’s birthrate is rapidly approaching replacement.

One-third of the current population in Arab countries is between 15 and 29 years old.  We are looking at the last Arab and Iranian “baby boomer” generation.  The population profile of these countries will go from a young to a rapidly aging population distribution over the next 30-50 years.  The tragedy is that this could happen without rapid economic development. 

The presidents of Turkey and Iran have talked about their countries’ low birthrates.  They are fully aware of the social stresses and political consequences.  In Turkey, the higher birth rate among the minority Kurds than among Turks is shifting the demographic balance.  Kurdish demands for more autonomy, or even a separate state, will become harder to resist, especially now that there is forming a de facto Kurdish state in neighboring Iraq. 

EGYPT


Egypt’s population 35 years ago was around 40 million; today it is 82 million.  Economic development has not kept up and the recent political turmoil has had a negative impact of the Egyptian economy.  Egypt is experiencing serious environmental degradation, according to a World Bank study.  Part of the problem is that poor agricultural practices are creating soil erosion and the spread of deserts.  Even current levels of food production may not be sustainable without drastic changes in agricultural practices, which would have destabilizing political consequences.

The pictures of Egyptian protesters are somewhat misleading.  The protesters appeared to be overwhelming young, reflecting the population in the Middle East and North Africa.  But Egypt also has a large rural population and high rates of illiteracy, especially among females.  The quality of education is poor and, as in most less-developed countries, there are very high rates of unemployment among the young. 

The tech-savvy, often bilingual young people who appeared on U.S. news channels are a very small percent of Egyptian society.  Egypt has about 500,000 Internet connections in a country of 82 million people.  The democratic coalition did very poorly in the first round of elections.  The Islamic parties drew their strength from the rural and urban poor. 

Egypt’s economic situation is becoming critical.  Despite a large rural population, Egypt cannot feed its population.  Egypt is the world’s largest importer of wheat.  It runs a large trade deficit, which has been covered by tourism (Egypt’s largest source of foreign capital), remittances from Egyptians working outside the country, the Suez Canal and foreign aid.  Tourism has temporarily ceased and Egyptians working in neighboring Libya have come home.  Foreign reserves are decreasing rapidly, partly because of capital flight.  

In addition, political turmoil in Egypt has apparently revived Israeli plans to build a high-speed railroad to carry containers from its port on the Red Sea to a Mediterranean port.  Some cargo ships then be able to bypass the Suez Canal and transport time between Asia and Europe will be reduced.
IRAN

Iran’s ability to deal with its economic problems is more difficult today than in 1979 when the Islamic Revolution began.  In 1979, Iran’s population was 37 million; it is now 75 million.  Iran, like other Muslim countries, is going through a “demographic transition” from high birthrates and high population growth to low birthrates and an aging population at a time when the country is experiencing severe economic stress and probably declining economic output.

Iran’s birthrate is very low.  Even if it doesn’t continue to decline, sometime after 2050 there will be more Iranians aged 55-75 than 20-40.  Iran’s age distribution will look like Europe but probably without the economic resources to support an aging population.

The Iranian economy may be on borrowed time.  Oil production is declining although oil revenues would be up, because of high world prices, if it were not for the economic sanctions.  Reflecting the lack of internal economic development, Iran is a large importer of refined oil products.  The price of gasoline is heavily subsidized with the revenue from selling crude oil.  Iran may not be a net oil exporter in about 15 years without massive new investment in its oil infrastructure.  But decreasing the massive subsidies for gasoline and other basic products runs the political risk of decreasing support for the Islamic rulers.

Iranian efforts to build nuclear weapons have taken a heavy economic toll.  American and European boycotts and sanctions have damaged the Iranian economy.  Oil revenue has been cut in half, from $100 billion a year to $50 billion a year.  There are shortages of virtually all products.  Inflation rates are very high.  Despite the “charm offensive” of Iran’s new president, it is unlikely that Iran will abandon its program of producing nuclear weapons.  The leaders of the powerful Revolutionary Guard, which manages the weapons program, have publicly told the new president that they will not support any suspension or abandonment of building nuclear weapons.

In addition, Iran is threatened by climate change and environmental challenges.  The immediate problem is water.  According to the former Iranian agricultural minister (an adviser to the new president), groundwater is decreasing and all bodies of natural water are drying up.  Deserts in Iran are spreading.  He fears that large parts of Iran will be uninhabitable in 30 years. 


GENERAL COMMENTS

With the exception of Turkey, Muslim countries in the Middle East have failed to compete in the global economy.  They have not attracted foreign capital investment, except in the areas of oil and tourism.

Arab countries and Iran do not produce goods and services they can sell in global markets.  Even with proximity to Europe, literacy and low wages, they cannot compete with East Asia.  All of the countries have an undereducated young population with very high unemployment rates (an estimated 30% in Egypt).  Many educated Arabs look for opportunities elsewhere.  Except for oil, the Arab countries and Iran have total exports that are less than those of Israel.  A rough equivalent would be if New Jersey, with less than 3% of the U.S. population, exported more goods and services to the rest of the world than the other 49 states combined.

Even the oil-rich countries have not fared well over the last 40 years.  The “oil curse” was discussed in an earlier post.  Much of the oil revenue has been spent fighting wars, on high military and “internal security” spending, supporting a small political and economic elite and, in Dubai, insanely expensive building (see Mission Impossible III) that has bankrupted the country.

Given the future demographics, it may be too late.  Egypt, like other countries, had 60 years of military and autocratic rule.  Its rulers failed to provide universal, quality education, and economic growth and development.  It has enriched a small, politically-connected elite and a privileged military.  We are looking at the political consequences of this failure.  But providing economic growth and development, or world-class secular education, may not be too high on the agenda of new governments. 

It is wide open what will come next.  It may not be democracy in some countries.  Recent actions by the military in Egypt indicate that they are not ready to tolerate an open, democratic society.  The military has used violence against demonstrations of Coptic Christians and raided the offices of foreign NGOs promoting democracy.  The democratic coalition fared poorly in the recent election, with Islamic parties receiving about two-thirds of the vote. 


IN THE LONG RUN

However, I am “cautiously optimistic” about the long run.  For decades, I’ve heard how there would never be democracy in “Confucian” cultures in East Asia or in “caudillo” cultures in Latin America.  Who would have thought that democratic governments would be the norm in central Europe?  Multi-party democracy has returned to Indonesia (another Muslim country with a low birthrate) with the end of the Sukarno regime.  Besides South Africa, at least five other African countries have held multi-party elections in the last few years.  Even the oppressive military regime of Burma (Myanmar) appears ready to tolerate at least some democracy.

Arab countries are riven by ethnic, clan and sectarian conflicts.  Traditional society is still strong.  Whether power can be shared and conflicts compromised through elections remains to be seen.  For Islamic parties, there is the negative example of Iran.  Not only has the regime turned most of its young people against it, but also against religious participation.  There is some polling evidence that Iran (or at least Tehran) has the lowest religious attendance in the Middle East.

There will still be brutal regimes in the world.  But opposition to such regimes will be fed by, among other factors, their inability to provide economic growth, good mass education, jobs (outside of those for people with political influence) and economic opportunity to their young populations.  Once again, a “baby boomer” generation is driving political change.

Comments

Most Popular Posts

Adam Smith's Pin Factory

Bilateral Oligopoly

The Stock Market Crash of 1929 and the Beginning of the Great Depression

List of Posts By Topic

Government Finance 101. Fiscal Policy: Welcome to Alice in Wonderland

Explaining Derivatives - An Analogy

Josiah Wedgwood, the Wedgwood Pottery Company, and the Beginning of the Industrial Revolution in England

John von Neumann Sees the Future

The Roman Republic Commits Suicide: A Cautionary Tale for America

The English East India Company (EIC): Trade with Asia